Curated peer advisory Councils
The right people for the
conversations that matter.
For professionally established women navigating significant professional decisions.
The gap
You can know a lot of people and still not have the right room for a decision that is still taking shape.
Concentric is built for the conversations that happen before the answer is settled — when you need perspective, challenge and context, not another person telling you what to do.
Inside a Council
Your decision stays yours.
The other five women help you examine it from angles you may not reach alone.
A decision still in play
“What am I actually deciding?”
What changes
Ask a better question
Get underneath the decision before rushing towards an answer.
The point is not consensus.
It is better thinking.
Why six
Small enough for every voice to matter. Different enough to change the conversation.
Each Council is deliberately composed around what its members are navigating — with enough shared context to understand one another and enough difference to bring useful perspective.
How Councils are composed →The Evidence Base
Concentric began with research, not an assumption.
Our first US study asked women about the professional challenges they were navigating, the support available to them and what they felt was missing.
Explore the Evidence Base →Edition One · Founding US pilot
Three Councils.
Six women in each.
Placement is by application and Placement Conversation rather than open enrollment.
How placement works
Apply
A short application tells us what you are currently navigating.
Placement Conversation
A 30-minute conversation to understand the context around it.
Council placement
We consider the composition of the room before offering a place.
The Journal
Thinking in public.
Essays and open questions on professional decisions, peer perspective and what happens when the answer is not settled yet.
Read The Journal →